NY Comic con on now

Welcome to the Sir Terry Pratchett Forums
Register here for the Sir Terry Pratchett forum and message boards.
Sign up
Jul 27, 2008
17,648
577
3,400
Stirlingshire, Scotland
#1
https://www.youtube.com/c/nycc/videos

AT 18:30 tonight The Watch live discussion which you can leave comments on.
Don't forget to watch this panel and the very first proper look at The Watch series at 6.15pm UK Time Ps. There is a Live Chat function at this panel if you watch it live. USE IT !
right here: http://bit.ly/TheWatchNYCC
 

pip

Sergeant-at-Arms
Sep 3, 2010
8,765
21
2,850
KILDARE
#2
Do we have to be polite
 

pip

Sergeant-at-Arms
Sep 3, 2010
8,765
21
2,850
KILDARE
#4
Got 25 mins in on this and had to stop. Yep all fears confirmed. Looks and sounds awful.
 
Jul 27, 2008
17,648
577
3,400
Stirlingshire, Scotland
#5
A piece unadulterated pile of steaming :poop::devil:. Left a couple of comments on the their forum I wonder how they will try and gloss all of them over.
 
Oct 1, 2009
4,437
81
2,150
Boston, MA USA
#6
Lord....this is going to be a horrific car wreck for any devoted Pterry fan. And, like a car wreck, I won't be able to turn my eyes away from its badness.....
 

RathDarkblade

Moderator
City Watch
Mar 24, 2015
9,513
529
3,175
44
Melbourne, Victoria
#7
****Warning: Rant, Long****

Oh no. :( Just two minutes in and I hear this -- "...we had to pick and mix the best bits across the books..."

Why on earth would you have to do anything like that?!! Because "none of the books lend themselves to an eight-part series"?

I wish he would explain why that is. Re-creating each book as an eight-part series sounds logical enough to me -- that's what BBC Radio 4 did with all the books (and with great success, might I add). Of course, they did them in 3 parts or 4 parts, or (in the case of the talking books) in 8 or 9 or 10 or 12 parts, depending on the size of the book and number of CDs. :)

The made-for-TV films did it, more or less. "Hogfather" did it pretty well. The "Colour of Magic/Light Fantastic" movie did well, too. There were some bits about the "Going Postal" movie I didn't like, but it worked. Heck, even the animated movies worked. They were all faithful to the books, more or less.

So to me, it makes more sense to use one book as the basis of an 8-part series. That would have given them much more room to explore and display each character in depth, as well as develop the plot of each book. As it is, what they actually did sounds like a crazy mishmash of characters and scenes from the series.

I won't even go into the part where the characters themselves were changed beyond recognition. Why this was done, I have no idea. *shrug*

-- "...and invent our own series, invent our own world."

Again, why? You have a world. It's called the Discworld. You have a series. It's called the City Watch books. And you shat all over it. :mad:

-- "You don't need to know the books to enjoy the series..." Um, exactly. Because you took the existing material and threw it all away.

-- "The books gave us license to..." No they didn't. You took license with the Discworld. That's a very different thing.

-- "... our show is set in a corner of this little multiverse..." Er, no -- it's not. It's set in Ankh-Morpork, a very well-defined CITY on the Disc. How well-defined? It's mapped out. We know where everything is. We know who is who, what they do, why they exist, how they make a living etc. It's not "a little corner of the multiverse." We're not talking about a tiny place somewhere like Slice or Twoshirts (although even they are pretty clearly developed in the books).

If you wanted a piece of Discworld to develop your own original story ... how about starting with (maybe) Howandaland? Or Nothingfjord? We don't know much about them, except what the Roundworld equivalents are (sub-Saharan Africa and Scandinavia, respectively).

I'm sorry, but I stopped watching after three minutes. I couldn't keep watching this knob crap all over the series that I love so much. :cry:

My guess? This bastardisation of the Discworld will majorly piss off a whole bunch of Discworld fans and, maybe, interest or amuse of a huge swatch of non-Discworld fans. Maybe some of them will read the books, realise they've been misled, feel aggrieved about the show, read more of Terry's books, and even (maybe) find their way here. I hope so.

Then again, maybe not. More likely, they might watch an episode here and there, and then watch something else instead.

I carried on watching and saw "Death" (?) being rude to the interviewer. I'm not sure why. The Death I know isn't rude to anyone. :|

Sigh ... I give up. :( Tell you what -- let's do a Kickstarter and film the real City Watch series! (If we can!) :mrgreen:

No? Well, it was just an idea ... ;)
 
Jul 27, 2008
17,648
577
3,400
Stirlingshire, Scotland
#10
Watched earlier James Masters interviewing Jim Butcher about the Dresden Files, the two latest books and he how originaly he wrote it as one book until his publisher said that due to the size it would be a 50$ book , so he then chaged it to two books Peace Talks and Battle Ground. And before that A Discovery of Witches Series 2 that was so good coming in January 21.
 

Catch-up

Sergeant-at-Arms
Jul 26, 2008
7,734
87
2,850
Michigan, U.S.A.
#11
I saw an article on the reveal and there were a handful of trailers there. I watched them all and felt like I was going to be sick. And I'm not someone who minds changes to stories/characters for film adaptations - generally. I was so hopeful that this would be fun, and respectful, in spite of the changes. Ugh!
 

Penfold

Sergeant-at-Arms
Dec 29, 2009
8,601
226
3,050
Worthing
www.lenbrookphotography.com
#12
Good review of a shit show Rath, apparently moves are afoot by Narrativia to do just that but I can't find where it says that.
I think this is what you are referring to, Dug, but it doesn't necessarily mean them doing The Watch. Rhianna Pratchett tweeted this just the other day. :)

https://narrativia.com/
 
Jul 27, 2008
17,648
577
3,400
Stirlingshire, Scotland
#13
I think this is what you are referring to, Dug, but it doesn't necessarily mean them doing The Watch. Rhianna Pratchett tweeted this just the other day. :)

https://narrativia.com/
Oh!! I did not mean The Watch, but further Discworld series but I did not make that clear enough.:rolleyes:
 

RathDarkblade

Moderator
City Watch
Mar 24, 2015
9,513
529
3,175
44
Melbourne, Victoria
#14
*looks at Narrativia* Phew! For a moment there, I thought they (or Motive pictures) had something to do with The Watch. Lucky escape there ...
 

Book of the Month

Good Omens

"Pratchett’s wackiness collaborates with Gaiman’s morbid humour; the result is a humanist delight to be savoured and read again and again."

Latest posts

User Menu

Newsletter