...that for the adaptations (stage, screen etc.), Angua and Carrot seem to be more or less interchangeable - or at least, almost of all Carrot's lines and scenes are given to Angua instead? (At least, of course, for adaptations of books other than "Guards! Guards!" or "Men at Arms").
What is going on? I just read the stage adaptation of "Making Money", and Carrot
But Angua
Also, in the "Going Postal" and "Hogfather" movies,
Carrot does appear in the stage production of "Men at Arms", as does Angua - and that makes sense, obviously. But in the adaptations of later books,
(Although to be honest, I haven't yet seen the stage adaptations of "Feet of Clay" or "Jingo" - two books in which Carrot and Angua are equally important characters).
So what's going on? Any ideas why directors are choosing to relegate Carrot to the background? I think it is a pity, because he has some of the best scenes (especially when he's dealing with rowdy crowds, e.g. in "Guards! Guards!" or "Feet of Clay"), or with robbers (beginning of "Feet of Clay" - co-operating with Angua).
I think that Carrot and Angua work well together, and it's a pity not to use him. 
Any ideas?
What is going on? I just read the stage adaptation of "Making Money", and Carrot
doesn't appear at all (and his lines are given to Angua).
still gets the lines that she has in the book.
we don't see Carrot at all.
Angua gets more scenes and more lines than Carrot does.
So what's going on? Any ideas why directors are choosing to relegate Carrot to the background? I think it is a pity, because he has some of the best scenes (especially when he's dealing with rowdy crowds, e.g. in "Guards! Guards!" or "Feet of Clay"), or with robbers (beginning of "Feet of Clay" - co-operating with Angua).
Any ideas?