Knight, I find it hard to agree with some of your thoughts. While certainly very precocious youngsters and teenagers consume the
Lord of the Rings series like soda pop, in terms of language, plot complexity and exposition it's most certainly written for adults. And while most American middle and high schools assign
To Kill a Mockingbird to its reading curriculum (I read it in fifth grade), it most certainly is not a "children's book" even if its main characters are children. I sincerely doubt that Harper Lee was targeting the book toward young readers.
I think Catch-up is right. A book aimed at a certain age reflects its age-appropriate content. That said, these days defining "age appropriate" can be a quagmire. My wife works as a librarian in a middle school (grades 6-8). Along with the usual Harry Potter and other series, the library also has all of the Twilight books, the Hunger Games books and other "young adult" (whatever that means) series and books that often incorporate language and sexual themes and violence I certainly never had access to in my sixth grade library. Of course, the library also has the Lord of the Rings series and other "adult" books since many students read them at a young age.
I would agree that the very best books written for children and young adults are those that adults can appreciate. Pterry's Tiffany Aching series is a perfect example--I like some of these books much more than any of the Rincewind books. In contrast, the worst children's books are ones that drive adults crazy. I hope that I never have to read "Goodnight Moon" to any baby or toddler ever again.
