...and finished reading Maclean's book. Very interesting ... but it made me curious. In every book I've read that mentions George IV (the Prince Regent), almost every author says that he was a fat, stupid wastrel.
Of course, Hugh Laurie portrays him as one in "Blackadder the Third", too.
But didn't he have some redeeming qualities? After all, he raised money for art galleries (I think?) and allowed the kilt tradition and bagpipe tradition in Scotland. All right, the kilt designs may have been (and probably were) different in his day than they were before the '45; I don't know. But at least he rescinded the stupid bans on kilts and bagpipes. *shrug* How a kilt can be an instrument of war, I don't know.
Of course, in many
other ways the Prince Regent was a fat waste of everybody's time and money.
Still, I'm not sure that he spent (as "Blackadder" puts it) £59,000 a year on socks. *LOL*
It's also interesting to note the SNP's rise to political power in Scotland, and what they achieved under Salmond and Sturgeon. (The book stops short in 2017, just after the Brexit vote - so I'm not sure what happened after that)?